PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.53%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.01%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 19.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 91.07%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.88%
SBC growth well above AMD's 13.13%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
112.65%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -83.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.27%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -136.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-259.14%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 62.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-66.67%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 52.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
164.15%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -115.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-950.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 118.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
61.61%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -3.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
40.17%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -1.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
102.51%
Acquisition growth of 102.51% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-42.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 79.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-16.54%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -67.66%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
80.57%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -550.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-56.37%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 110.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.16%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 18.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.