PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.23%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -19.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.09%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 368.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
114.63%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -419.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.88%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 77.68%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-831.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 18.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-608.55%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -39.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
52.40%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-6.67%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -98.55%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-79.04%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 205.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-700.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 1227.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.34%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.30%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 17.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-94.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.18%
Purchases well above AMD's 35.48%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-4.22%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 285.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.12%
Growth well above AMD's 88.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
59.35%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 34988.89%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -151.16%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.