176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AMD at -761.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.09%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -19.20%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-140.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.90%
SBC growth while AMD is negative at -1.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-143.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 63.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-13.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -59.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-49.73%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -14.85%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
39.34%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -39.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-373.04%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 139.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1782.43%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -2666.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.93%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -14.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-32.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -27.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
40.00%
Some acquisitions while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
54.81%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -535.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-7.28%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -57.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-250.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 700.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
264.59%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -215.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
97.82%
Debt repayment growth of 97.82% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-220.90%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 15.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.