PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-59.46%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 119.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.17%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -13.22%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
18.27%
Well above AMD's 11.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
12.11%
SBC growth well above AMD's 12.62%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
101.76%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -90.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
115.23%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -416.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-29.46%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
19.22%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 223.29%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
159.25%
Growth well above AMD's 20.66%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-99.86%
Negative yoy while AMD is 83.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-26.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AMD at -22.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-19.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 20.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
63.89%
Acquisition growth of 63.89% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.39%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 34.64%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-17.75%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 29.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
14.29%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -116.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-38.06%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 64.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 72.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.