PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.66%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 1007.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.41%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-20.09%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 20.44%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.97%
SBC growth well above AMD's 1.44%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-3110.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -43.99%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
241.67%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -173.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
22.34%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 136.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-401.64%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -331.78%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -10.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1800.00%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -76.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-69.13%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 11.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-22.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
39.96%
Purchases well above AMD's 55.44%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
2.54%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -6.87%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
40.00%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -900.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
94.56%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 123.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -1121.21%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.