PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
107.94%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 123.08%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
4.93%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-21.62%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.81%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 5.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
132.99%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -48.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
163.66%
AR growth well above AMD's 56.80%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -22.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
78.95%
AP growth well above AMD's 66.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-46.19%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 23.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
188.24%
Growth of 188.24% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
473.72%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -9.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
3.96%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -12.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.31%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 17.34%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-55.17%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 10.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-327.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 40.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-100.13%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 47.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.19%
Similar buyback growth to AMD's 65.51%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.