PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.13%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 47.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.94%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -5.60%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-1921.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 44.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.71%
Less SBC growth vs. AMD's 7.37%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
148.52%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -968.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-40.00%
AR is negative yoy while AMD is 25033.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-14.71%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -88.40%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-107.83%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 50.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
1868.39%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -159.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1338.38%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -37.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
33.45%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -27.71%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -1.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.46%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 51.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
133.18%
Below 50% of AMD's 342.22%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-4576.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
6.81%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 70.59%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-191.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -161.41%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.