176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 8.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
5.61%
D&A growth well above AMD's 2.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-7.74%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 80.24%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.05%
SBC growth well above AMD's 1.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-299.04%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 175.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
25.32%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -55.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-39.17%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 61.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
3840.91%
AP growth well above AMD's 389.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-97.71%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 35.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.38%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -1161.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.58%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 114.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-164.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -33.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-612.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
39.14%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -12.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.06%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -16.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
94.44%
Growth of 94.44% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
44.07%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -543.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Buyback growth below 50% of AMD's 32.73%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.