PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 8.32%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.39%
D&A growth well above AMD's 2.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
64.51%
Well above AMD's 80.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
8.59%
SBC growth well above AMD's 1.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
149.76%
Well above AMD's 175.40% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-101.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -55.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.67%
Negative yoy inventory while AMD is 61.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
105.22%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 389.27%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
4124.14%
Growth well above AMD's 35.05%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-975.44%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -1161.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AMD's 114.16%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
16.79%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -33.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
46.76%
Acquisition growth of 46.76% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
0.89%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -12.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-58.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -16.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
302.72%
Growth of 302.72% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-36.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -543.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while AMD is 32.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.