PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.69%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AVGO at -16.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.66%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 1.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Well above AVGO's 149.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
SBC growth well above AVGO's 31.11%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
58.56%
Well above AVGO's 0.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -58.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
21.54%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -49.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth well above AVGO's 122.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-35.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -55.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-47.14%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -16.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-98.63%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-31.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while AVGO is 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-35.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -73.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AVGO at -34.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
2886.21%
Growth well above AVGO's 2940.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
20.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 170.68%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.