PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
34.23%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -16.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-19.92%
Negative yoy D&A while AVGO is 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-102.35%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 149.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-78.68%
Negative yoy SBC while AVGO is 31.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
107.34%
Well above AVGO's 0.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
144.81%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -58.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
143.18%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -49.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-205.92%
Negative yoy AP while AVGO is 122.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-101.15%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -55.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.49%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -16.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.67%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.88%
CapEx growth well above AVGO's 1.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.99%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -73.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.49%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -34.62%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.12%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 170.68%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.34%
We slightly raise equity while AVGO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.