PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.80%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AVGO at -16.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.74%
Less D&A growth vs. AVGO's 1.66%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
99.93%
Well above AVGO's 149.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-99.93%
Negative yoy SBC while AVGO is 31.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-75.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -58.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
65.49%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -49.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while AVGO is 122.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-203.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -55.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
177.25%
Some yoy increase while AVGO is negative at -16.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.26%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
2.69%
CapEx growth well above AVGO's 1.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
27.78%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -73.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
218.65%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -34.62%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 2940.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
90.46%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 170.68%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-149.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 98.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.