PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
53.51%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -16.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
37.00%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 1.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
716.37%
Well above AVGO's 149.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
495026.74%
SBC growth well above AVGO's 31.11%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-132.48%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
266.15%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -49.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -55.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.35%
Some yoy increase while AVGO is negative at -16.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-20.37%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-162.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while AVGO is 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-3043200.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AVGO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-108.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -73.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
53.13%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -34.62%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10342.61%
We reduce yoy invests while AVGO stands at 170.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.55%
We slightly raise equity while AVGO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.