PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AVGO at -16.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.63%
Negative yoy D&A while AVGO is 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-331.25%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 149.74%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-59.60%
Negative yoy SBC while AVGO is 31.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.79%
Well above AVGO's 0.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
143.06%
AR growth while AVGO is negative at -58.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
8.02%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -49.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
188.76%
AP growth well above AVGO's 122.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
59.50%
Some yoy usage while AVGO is negative at -55.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-19.83%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -16.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
33.03%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.32%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
50.29%
CapEx growth well above AVGO's 1.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-542.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -73.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
167.39%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -34.62%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 2940.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
75.51%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 170.68%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-25.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 98.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.