PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.77%
Negative net income growth while AVGO stands at 137.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while AVGO is 59.14%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
22.22%
Some yoy growth while AVGO is negative at -103.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-10.17%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AVGO at -1.46%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-111.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -836.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-154.84%
AR is negative yoy while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
228.57%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 170.65%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
277.78%
A yoy AP increase while AVGO is negative at -245.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-140.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -1195.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -61.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-39.53%
Negative yoy CFO while AVGO is 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -68.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.96%
Purchases growth of 41.96% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
14.47%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
20.00%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
182.63%
We have mild expansions while AVGO is negative at -1326.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
66.67%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of AVGO's 94.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-270.37%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.