PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.19%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -43.15%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.26%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -18.58%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
322.73%
Well above AVGO's 53.67% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
7.89%
SBC growth while AVGO is negative at -1.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
71.87%
Well above AVGO's 99.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-58.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AVGO at -239.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-25.93%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AVGO at -77.60%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
152.63%
AP growth well above AVGO's 122.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
212.35%
Growth well above AVGO's 127.43%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-66.67%
Negative yoy while AVGO is 121.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
150.00%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 37.27%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -19.53%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
73.17%
Purchases well above AVGO's 97.95%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-61.48%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AVGO at -77.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
6420.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 119175.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-65.25%
We reduce yoy invests while AVGO stands at 96.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
77.52%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of AVGO's 98.26%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.