176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
43.32%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -67.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AVGO stands at 100.81%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.49%
SBC growth well above AVGO's 6.42%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
204.55%
Slight usage while AVGO is negative at -8700.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
118.99%
AR growth well above AVGO's 5.42%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-2.94%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AVGO at -66.07%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
28.57%
A yoy AP increase while AVGO is negative at -145.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-83.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -84.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -48.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
64.11%
Some CFO growth while AVGO is negative at -2.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while AVGO is 36.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -4880.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
11.62%
Liquidation growth of 11.62% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
12.34%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -96.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
9.16%
We have mild expansions while AVGO is negative at -12.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
54.41%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of AVGO's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.08%
We have some buyback growth while AVGO is negative at -1459.37%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.