PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AVGO at -54.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.67%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 19.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
87.83%
Well above AVGO's 68.14% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
13.38%
SBC growth well above AVGO's 0.18%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-77.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -113.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-77.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AVGO at -237.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
198.08%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -81.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
65.74%
Lower AP growth vs. AVGO's 179.59%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-164.16%
Negative yoy usage while AVGO is 81.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AVGO's 306.25%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-19.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AVGO at -6.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.95%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Purchases growth of 39.96% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
75.53%
Liquidation growth of 75.53% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
567.90%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -212.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
3637.50%
We have mild expansions while AVGO is negative at -12385.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x AVGO's 7.48%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
Similar buyback growth to AVGO's 71.21%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.