PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.36%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AVGO's 46.23%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
1.10%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 0.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
135.71%
Some yoy growth while AVGO is negative at -143.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
25.28%
SBC growth while AVGO is negative at -5.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-50.50%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 238.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-275.27%
AR is negative yoy while AVGO is 212.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
47.06%
Some inventory rise while AVGO is negative at -125.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
163.41%
AP growth well above AVGO's 99.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
159.46%
Some yoy usage while AVGO is negative at -120.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
250.00%
Well above AVGO's 87.69%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
30.00%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of AVGO's 38.37%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
11.72%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -37.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.40%
Liquidation growth of 100.40% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
125.39%
Growth well above AVGO's 144.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
137.12%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 100.22%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.30%
We have some buyback growth while AVGO is negative at -29.59%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.