PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.88%
Net income growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.27%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.69%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-971.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.43%
Negative yoy SBC while AVGO is 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
61.66%
Slight usage while AVGO is negative at -24.30%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-89.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AVGO at -164.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-216.95%
Negative yoy inventory while AVGO is 48.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-6.15%
Negative yoy AP while AVGO is 186.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
113.77%
Some yoy usage while AVGO is negative at -140.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
840.00%
Well above AVGO's 6.78%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
99.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 3.59%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-23.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -5.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
70.44%
Some acquisitions while AVGO is negative at -40.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-29.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while AVGO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
173.00%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
41.18%
We have some outflow growth while AVGO is negative at -99.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
64.24%
We have mild expansions while AVGO is negative at -260.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.32%
Negative yoy issuance while AVGO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 84.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.