PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.37%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -167.52%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.92%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
28.95%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AVGO's 811.94%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
16.27%
SBC growth while AVGO is negative at -5.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1470.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
58.39%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. AVGO's 262.77%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-254.58%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AVGO at -80.49%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-40.75%
Negative yoy AP while AVGO is 501.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-185.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AVGO at -225.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.79%
Some yoy increase while AVGO is negative at -101.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 8.36%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
3.81%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -30.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AVGO stands at 721.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-110.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -23.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
11.20%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -88.10%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-104.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-610.76%
We reduce yoy invests while AVGO stands at 559.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
87.52%
We repay more while AVGO is negative at -111.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.