PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -16.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.39%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 1.66%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
64.51%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AVGO's 149.74%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
8.59%
Less SBC growth vs. AVGO's 31.11%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
149.76%
Well above AVGO's 0.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-101.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AVGO at -58.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AVGO at -49.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
105.22%
AP growth well above AVGO's 122.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
4124.14%
Some yoy usage while AVGO is negative at -55.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-975.44%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -16.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.32%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
16.79%
CapEx growth well above AVGO's 1.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
46.76%
Acquisition growth of 46.76% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
0.89%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -73.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-58.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AVGO at -34.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
302.72%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AVGO's 2940.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-36.49%
We reduce yoy invests while AVGO stands at 170.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 98.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.