176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -240.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.39%
D&A growth well above INTC's 12.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
64.51%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 357.89%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
8.59%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -2.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
149.76%
Well above INTC's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-101.53%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 42.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-21.67%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 319.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
105.22%
Lower AP growth vs. INTC's 247.50%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
4124.14%
Growth well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-975.44%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -527.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 152.15%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
16.79%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 31.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
46.76%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
0.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. INTC's 30.77%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-58.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -39.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
302.72%
Growth well above INTC's 79.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-36.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -2675.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.