PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.32%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -12.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-13.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -8.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
99.71%
Well above INTC's 140.35% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-142.86%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-76.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -179.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
90.15%
AR growth of 90.15% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
56.90%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -44.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-116.69%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
138.39%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -175.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-77.09%
Negative yoy while INTC is 167.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.58%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -51.43%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
74.85%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 20.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-106.21%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
27.20%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -33.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
226.86%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 81.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-8060.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 104.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
44.85%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 48.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.47%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 253.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.