PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.69%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -2.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
9.66%
D&A growth well above INTC's 0.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Well above INTC's 52.17% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
SBC growth well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
58.56%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 133.02%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
21.54%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -90.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-35.01%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 142.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-47.14%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -76.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-98.63%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 54.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-31.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-35.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 38.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -12.76%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
2886.21%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -357.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. INTC's 62.03%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -48.50%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.