176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-61.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -20.39%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.33%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -2.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.52%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 26.60%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -301.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
67.16%
AR growth of 67.16% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-134.57%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 6.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
289.53%
AP growth of 289.53% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-112.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -1066.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
348.40%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -8.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-67.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -55.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-157.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.69%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 25.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
23.49%
At 50-75% of INTC's 42.02%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
100.00%
Growth well above INTC's 92.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-15.66%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 73.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
700.61%
Stock issuance far above INTC's 154.21%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.