PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.66%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 2.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.57%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.69%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-25.75%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.01%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -67.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
79.44%
AR growth of 79.44% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-102.10%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -133.45%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
158.78%
AP growth of 158.78% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
97.33%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. INTC's 720.69%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-100.18%
Negative yoy while INTC is 809.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6579.03%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -8.72%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-50.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -73.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-58.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 44.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-12.28%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -27.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 104.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-344.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -451.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.64%
Stock issuance far above INTC's 151.70%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.