PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.13%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -34.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.48%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -36500.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-17952.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 43.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-12.31%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -105.29%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-7148.17%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 158.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
526.92%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -26.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -26.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-116.12%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.15%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 30.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.96%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -13.43%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1107.50%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 70.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -68.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-3.25%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 66.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.