PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
9.20%
D&A growth well above INTC's 3.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
38.65%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 322.22%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
13.26%
SBC growth well above INTC's 2.19%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-321.52%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 91.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1188.16%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 226.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
193.84%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -5.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-215.57%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 643.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-15.91%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 51.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
74.88%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -105.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-52.37%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 59.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
25.23%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 10.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
Purchases well above INTC's 24.60%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
85.70%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -24.07%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-293.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -151.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-8.20%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 16.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -134.78%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-53.69%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.