PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.13%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.44%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 2.94%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-150.06%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-7.56%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -1.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
106.64%
Well above INTC's 211.03% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
176.86%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -178.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
26.97%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -3.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
128.31%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -129.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-31.20%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 304.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-758.45%
Negative yoy while INTC is 64.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
197.99%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 8.61%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-67.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -29.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -134.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-115.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -103.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-5.65%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 47.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 291.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-5.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -174.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-20.58%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 86.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
30.90%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.