176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
96.98%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -2.20%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.13%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -3.54%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
179.92%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -426.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
78.55%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 937.50%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
55.09%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -74.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-1937.56%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -147.58%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-4.14%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 1282.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
110.36%
Growth well above INTC's 186.68%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
644.85%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -112.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
2281.65%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.20%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-114.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -23.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.77%
Purchases well above INTC's 4.55%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-19.08%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 3.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-237.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -4.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
74.72%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -3.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
3.69%
Debt repayment growth of 3.69% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.