176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.11%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 18.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
1.43%
D&A growth well above INTC's 1.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
247.68%
Well above INTC's 22.10% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
5.88%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -7.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
37.81%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -75.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
58.62%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -1600.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
62.52%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -3.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-111.56%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -2262.50%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
24.60%
Growth well above INTC's 13.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-17.20%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -205.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
68.26%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
55.10%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 13.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.83%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-70.35%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -99.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-126.32%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 76.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.04%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -100.34%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.