PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.37%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -1.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-11.84%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.55%
SBC growth of 5.55% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
359.79%
Well above INTC's 105.21% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.43%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -375.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-195.87%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1035.24%
AP growth well above INTC's 122.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
594.86%
Growth well above INTC's 75.08%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
213.68%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -220.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
146.87%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.37%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-73.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
244.54%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -190.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-239.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -11.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
66.89%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -9.69%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-150.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 48500.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-486.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -93.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.99%
Debt repayment growth of 63.99% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.