PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.66%
Net income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 16.21%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-2.75%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -5.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.80%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 51.90%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.50%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -4.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
253.87%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -171.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
196.15%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -185.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-268.49%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 17.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-149.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -203.67%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
452.03%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -13.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
49.95%
Well above INTC's 66.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
105.33%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -5.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
21.88%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -102.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 52.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.07%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 87.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-114700.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 201.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1940.25%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 129.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x INTC's 48.98%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.