176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
846.15%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 153.98%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.04%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
13.51%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -327.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
8.33%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -10.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-270.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 103.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
62.71%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -300.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
666.67%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 70.21%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-62.96%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -216.95%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-409.38%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 311.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-65.12%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -61.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
56.44%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
29.17%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -7.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -43.50%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-36.03%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 9.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-25.98%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 27.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-79.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 346.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-180.57%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 35.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x INTC's 43.16%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.