PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.48%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 748.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.86%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
7.04%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 41.04%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-240.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -103.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-2242.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -70.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
76.32%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -74.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-291.18%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 265.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-411.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -104.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
61.54%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -19.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-60.89%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -13.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-5.88%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 28.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
400.00%
Acquisition spending well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
95.37%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -33.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
50.53%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -1.75%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-150.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 15.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
302.14%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 8.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-167.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 95.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
9.52%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -47750.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.