PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.17%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -23.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.56%
D&A growth well above INTC's 5.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
109.86%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -174.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.38%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 13.41%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-104.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -1803.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
157.14%
AR growth well above INTC's 81.42%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-103.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -445.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-65.08%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 189.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-119.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -183.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-260.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 757.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.41%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -28.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
71.63%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 14.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 603.27%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-36950.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -41.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-32.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -18.06%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-171750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -876.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-14695.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -49.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
77.78%
Debt repayment above 1.5x INTC's 21.58%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1771.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -11.65%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.