PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.50%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 5.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.51%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -2.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
21.57%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -43.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.10%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 20.82%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-1428.57%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 111.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-889.29%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 408.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-14550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -81.84%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
581.82%
AP growth well above INTC's 19.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.96%
Growth well above INTC's 115.03%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-75.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 55.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-36.82%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 52.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -7.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -26.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
915.44%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -2.80%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
80.31%
Growth well above INTC's 101.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
77.33%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -20.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x INTC's 80.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.92%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -20.51%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.