PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-53.98%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.71%
D&A growth well above INTC's 10.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-315.66%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.77%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -3.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
152.99%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -58.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
242.55%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -20.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
52.00%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -256.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-790.38%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -110.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
852.17%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -22.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -302.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
84.39%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -7.68%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-35.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.21%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -163.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-61.79%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 38.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-34.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 486.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-81.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -14.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
60.00%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -158.20%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 23.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.