PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.39%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -16.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.67%
Deferred tax of 46.67% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
702.00%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -87.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
132.92%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -70.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-32.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -207.94%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
74.36%
AP growth well above INTC's 61.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-89.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -85.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
33.33%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 94.25%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
75.21%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -26.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.85%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -9.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.52%
Purchases well above INTC's 56.12%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.70%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 66.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-62.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 147.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-64.57%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 92.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-304.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.