PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.79%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 36.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.22%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -3.84%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
4.55%
Deferred tax of 4.55% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-1.35%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-58.60%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 560.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-292.38%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 18.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-56.86%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 60.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-23.53%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -61.22%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
2728.57%
Growth well above INTC's 917.19%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
3050.00%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -12838.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-10.67%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 20.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-39.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -9.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -75.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-99.85%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -15.86%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 862.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-112.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -642.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.44%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of INTC's 80.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.