176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.17%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 50.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
277.57%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -1.55%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-600.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
66.96%
SBC growth well above INTC's 45.65%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
171.31%
Well above INTC's 103.90% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
117.67%
AR growth well above INTC's 40.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
135.76%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -270.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-111.27%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -59.74%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
653.33%
Growth well above INTC's 117.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-325.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -84.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
72.39%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 57.64%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-40.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-20891.18%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-756.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -53.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
128900.00%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -11.94%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-608.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -106.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1178.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -171.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.84%
Debt repayment growth of 99.84% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to INTC's 95.05%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.