PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 34.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-25.99%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
33.75%
Deferred tax of 33.75% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.41%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -12.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-368.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -23.53%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1152.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -273.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-272.22%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -254.90%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2912.50%
AP growth well above INTC's 449.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-315.06%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 160.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
122.22%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -87.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-18.38%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-117.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -14.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
81.04%
Acquisition growth of 81.04% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.72%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -36.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
239.22%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 2.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
97.15%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 1023.08%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
85.17%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -54.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -894.80%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.