PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.06%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -32.24%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.01%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.88%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -17.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
112.65%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -2334.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.27%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -12.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-259.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -3.78%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-66.67%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -85.82%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
164.15%
Some yoy usage while INTC is negative at -96.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-950.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -30.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
61.61%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -41.44%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
40.17%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -71.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
102.51%
Acquisition growth of 102.51% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-42.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 20.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-16.54%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 88.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
80.57%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -84.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-56.37%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 52.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.16%
Buyback growth of 24.16% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.