PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.23%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.09%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
114.63%
Deferred tax of 114.63% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.88%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 57.46%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-831.03%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 58.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-608.55%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 325.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
52.40%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -1.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-6.67%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -234.74%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-79.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -3658.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-700.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -41.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.34%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.30%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 37.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-94.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 3231.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
31.18%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -76.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-4.22%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.12%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -1331.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
59.35%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 47.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x INTC's 85.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.