PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.16%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -105.60%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.78%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -5.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-870.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.39%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 26.17%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
56.45%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -251.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
5.38%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -57.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
22.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 79.16%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
198.57%
AP growth well above INTC's 291.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
316.67%
Growth well above INTC's 9.86%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
113.97%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 229.41%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
43.12%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -86.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
38.59%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -51.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-350.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -99.47%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 66.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-30.02%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -1.07%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
350.00%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -156.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 106.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
23.27%
Buyback growth of 23.27% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.