PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.79%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 2011.45%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.20%
Less D&A growth vs. INTC's 209.66%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
88.65%
Deferred tax of 88.65% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
20.22%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -11.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-539.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -189.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
34.99%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. INTC's 96.54%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
4.07%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -754.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-6.70%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -297.96%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-841.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -127.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-152.63%
Negative yoy while INTC is 1087.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.36%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 855.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -166.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-3960.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 18697.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-41.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -393.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.58%
Below 50% of INTC's 166.55%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-440.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -118.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-75.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -4294.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
79.78%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -103.14%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
7350.00%
Issuance growth of 7350.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-19.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.