PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.88%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -107.62%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.69%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -66.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-971.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -7.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
61.66%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 147.62%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-89.07%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 67.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-216.95%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 80.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-6.15%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 194.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
113.77%
Growth well above INTC's 118.04%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
840.00%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -38.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
99.67%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -0.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.53%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 70.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
70.44%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -174.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-29.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 60.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
173.00%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -53.61%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
41.18%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 141.09%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
64.24%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 51.31%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-41.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.