PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -318.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.09%
Some D&A expansion while INTC is negative at -28.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-140.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.90%
SBC growth well above INTC's 0.41%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-143.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -149.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-13.87%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -91.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-49.73%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 158.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
39.34%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -269.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-373.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -313.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1782.43%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -86.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.93%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -123.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-32.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -30.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
40.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. INTC's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
54.81%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -29.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-7.28%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -23.65%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-250.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -20.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
264.59%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -148.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
97.82%
We repay more while INTC is negative at -222.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-220.90%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.