PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.66%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -78.95%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.41%
D&A growth well above INTC's 7.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-20.09%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 819.05%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.97%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -16.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-3110.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 178.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
241.67%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -82.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
22.34%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -48.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-401.64%
Negative yoy AP while INTC is 106.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-40.30%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 131.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1800.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 131.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-69.13%
Negative yoy CFO while INTC is 107.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-22.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while INTC is negative at -51.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
39.96%
Some yoy expansion while INTC is negative at -21.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
2.54%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -23.59%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
40.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. INTC's 115.27%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
94.56%
We have mild expansions while INTC is negative at -163.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while INTC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.